Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: penelopesire
This sounds unconstitutional.

Why? Nefarious perhaps, but only unconstitutional because it doesn't seem to fit into one the delegated powers of the FedGuv. Power to take the Census only authorizes an "enumeration", that is a count, not collecting detailed information, like how many loos (or guns) you've got.

However they do need to know about where those people they count live, although addresses would work as well as GPS coordinates, so that Congressional districts can be reapportioned so as to get (about) the same number of people in each district.

291 posted on 04/29/2009 4:53:56 PM PDT by El Gato ("The Second Amendment is the RESET button of the United States Constitution." -- Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: El Gato

I hate to be the one to do it, but this is “much ado about nothing.” By now, every city in the US has aerial photos of every property with geodetic coordinates on the corners of each frame.

All O has to do is get copies of the photos.


294 posted on 04/29/2009 5:00:25 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

To: El Gato

That’s what I am saying basically. All of the personal questions and GPS stuff seems unconstitutional.

Are we bound by law to answer all of the questions? What are our rights?


296 posted on 04/29/2009 5:04:13 PM PDT by penelopesire ("The only CHANGE you will get with the Democrats is the CHANGE left in your pocket")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson