Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich Responds to 2012 Questions; Discusses Differences with Rush Limbaugh - Video 3/10/09
Freedom's Lighthouse ^ | March 11, 2009 | BrianinMO

Posted on 03/11/2009 5:19:17 AM PDT by Federalist Patriot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 03/11/2009 5:19:17 AM PDT by Federalist Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Newt’s DOA. He should set his sights lower as a behind-the-scenes strategy guy, where he excels.


2 posted on 03/11/2009 5:20:22 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

Newt should have been asked if, in a hypothetical world, he had been living as an East German during the 1960’s, he would have wanted to see the policies of Moscow’s puppet Walter Ulbricht succeed, or fail.


3 posted on 03/11/2009 5:24:21 AM PDT by mkjessup (You're either with our Constitution, or you are with TKU ("The Kenyan Usurper"). CHOOSE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

SEcretary of State. That is the role he should be slated for. With his extensive knowledge of history he should excel in that role.


4 posted on 03/11/2009 5:25:42 AM PDT by Sudetenland (Victory in 2012...but first Victory in 2010!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
If Gingrich had stayed in Congress instead of having a fit and quiting, he would still be there doing much more for us than he can visiting talk shows.
5 posted on 03/11/2009 5:27:52 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot

“Gingrich responds to 2012 questions.”

How long did that take?


6 posted on 03/11/2009 5:29:07 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("There are more enjoyable ways of going to Hell." ~ St. Bernard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner; Ann Coulter
[ Newt’s DOA. ]

Americas DOA unless we get a "change".. Newt is the ONLY viable candidate for president.. That is if the federal voting mechanism is not completely broken.. Voter fraud has reached malignant stages.. The republican party has ignored it for a decade(s).. Machine politics seems to be the norm now.. Chicago, New Jersey, New York and Massachusetts machines are in charge..

7 posted on 03/11/2009 5:36:20 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

No Newt is good Newt.


8 posted on 03/11/2009 5:40:31 AM PDT by icwhatudo (The Dow is down nearly 6,000 points since democrats took back congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe

And the company that owns the voting machine is 28% owned by...Hugo Chavez. Boy, we’re doomed.


9 posted on 03/11/2009 5:41:09 AM PDT by Ben Reyes (Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

Noot needs to decide on which side he allies with - The Beltway or Flyover Country.


10 posted on 03/11/2009 5:42:43 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
Newt danced around the question, but clearly is leaving the door wide open to run.

Newt tries to float that lead balloon every few months. He's been doing it since 2004.

If he did happen to get the nomination [hey, McCain did], he would get fewer electoral votes than McCain did.
11 posted on 03/11/2009 5:43:42 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
[ If he did happen to get the nomination [hey, McCain did], he would get fewer electoral votes than McCain did. ]

Not true.. He might not win but he is no McQueeg..

12 posted on 03/11/2009 5:46:47 AM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
Just another beltway republican sellout. Long on words, short on conservative deeds.


13 posted on 03/11/2009 5:47:22 AM PDT by TADSLOS ( Join the Conservative Revolution! http://falconparty.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

He even floated some balloons back in 1996.


14 posted on 03/11/2009 5:48:16 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Federalist Patriot
Newt Clintons—Buh bye, Newt!
15 posted on 03/11/2009 5:48:40 AM PDT by Dahoser (America's great untapped alternative energy source: The Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
Newt is the ONLY viable candidate for president.

Is that sarcasm? Personality matters greatly in presidential politics. Newt is way way too unlikable, even to those that agree with him, to crack the 40% mark in a national election. Did I mention that he's stuck on himself for no discernible reason? Did I mention that during impeachment he hypocritical, stupid bastard was carrying on his own extra-marital affair while waxing indignant for the cameras? Newt? No thanks.

16 posted on 03/11/2009 5:52:09 AM PDT by Minn (Here is a realistic picture of the prophet: ----> ([: {()
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: hosepipe
[ If he did happen to get the nomination [hey, McCain did], he would get fewer electoral votes than McCain did. ]

Not true.. He might not win but he is no McQueeg..


You need to work on your reading comprehension. I didn't say he was a McQueeg. I said he would get fewer electoral votes than McQueeg got. Of course, to get electoral votes, he would have to win the nomination.
17 posted on 03/11/2009 5:53:55 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Minn

And don’t mention his ethics problems he had during his House tenure.

[The media will mention that plenty, should Newt even declare to run.]


18 posted on 03/11/2009 5:56:17 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

He’s a Wonk, nothing less and nothing more, just a Wonk. His blathering gets soo tiresome, the kind that makes a student daydream about what’s going on outside the classroom.


19 posted on 03/11/2009 6:01:45 AM PDT by opaque soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Yep, Newt is an appropriate name for him.

I have never liked him. Don’t trust him. Another McLame.


20 posted on 03/11/2009 6:40:41 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (Welcome to Obama's America... Be afraid, be very afraid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson