[Man50D]

I noticed in the case of In Newman v. United States ex Rel. Frizzell, it states It permits those proceedings to be instituted by the Attorney General of the United States and by the attorney for the District of Columbia.

Does "and" mean both are required to file Quo Warranto?

[Kansas58]

I am trying to mesh this post with what Orly Taitz (SP?) is doing.

I think I might understand better now, though the author of this post makes clear that perhaps he would have done it differently.

I am one who has always thought that Obama was hiding something, though I was not sure what he was hiding.

Paternity, Geography, College Admission/Grant/Loan status Lots of questions.

I have said that I thought state legislatures need to address this issue, since States control ballots, and their Electors, to the Electoral College.

I was not sure why I felt that way, that most of the present cases were only useful for publicity, that these cases, on their own, would probably not remove Obama, but now I feel like I understand what was bothering me.

Separation of Powers is important.

Also, I would rather the Obama qualifications issue is well known, prior to the next Presidential election, even to the point that maybe Obama will not appear on the ballot in a couple of states due to documentation issues.

I think there will be hell to pay, if Obama is forced out before this term is up. I would rather the voters rebuke him, in 2 years, and then kick him out, in 4.

However, the law is the law and the lawyers who are on these cases deserve our support and prayers.