[Fred Nerks]

from your link:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/9-1.pdf

MOTION TO DISMISS

President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on
August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii. See, e.g., Factcheck.org, “Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obama’s
birth certificate,” available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that
the birth certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu
newspaper). Hawaii officials have publicly verified that they have President Obama’s “original birth certificate
on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” See “Certified,” Honolulu Star Bulletin, Oct. 31,
2008. This Court can take judicial notice of these public news reports. See The Washington Post v. Robinson,
935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980).

[MindBender26]

Plz note, the site cited is actually “Annenberg Fact Check.”

Is this the same Annenberg that has financed “Bomber Bill” Ayers” (and his closest friend Barack Obama’s ) radical campaigns for the last 20 years?

[urtax$@work]

So, i read the motion to dismiss and on page 2 of 11, i saw
the footnote, see below.

Is there wedgie room for questioning or challanging reference material in a legal document submitted to a court !?!

---

1 President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on
August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii. See, e.g., Factcheck.org, “Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obama’s