Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jeff Sessions Shows Hypocrisy On Spending
JeffWartman.com ^ | 02/01/2009 | Jeff Wartman

Posted on 02/01/2009 9:32:25 AM PST by wartman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: wartman

No, I’m saying that as long as there are political parties, there will be loyalty to those parties.

Think about that...now can you go back to wherever you came from.


21 posted on 02/01/2009 9:57:07 AM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wartman

More left wing spew... Sessions and the others are recovering spenders... at least they can admit when they are wrong


22 posted on 02/01/2009 10:00:51 AM PST by Fred ('The bigger the fix, the bigger the fool')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

And it’s really, really sad that people put mindless partisanship over doing whats right. Pathetic, even.


23 posted on 02/01/2009 10:01:18 AM PST by wartman (http://www.jeffwartman.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wartman

I would agree that GW Bush has spent too much on non-WOT items, but it’s misleading to categorize Homeland Security spending with education and prescription drugs.

Your short article would have been better if it included specific Sessions votes and dates. Lately, Sessions voted against the Palson bailout scam, the GM bailout scam, and I believe he will vote against the Obama Swine-ulus.


24 posted on 02/01/2009 10:05:13 AM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas
Your short article would have been better if it included specific Sessions votes and dates. Lately, Sessions voted against the Palson bailout scam, the GM bailout scam, and I believe he will vote against the Obama Swine-ulus.

Which would be fantastic. But we need to take those to task who are responsible for doubling the national debt.
25 posted on 02/01/2009 10:07:37 AM PST by wartman (http://www.jeffwartman.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wartman

“And it’s really, really sad that people put mindless partisanship over doing whats right. Pathetic, even.”

I wouldn’t say mindless though...the Republicans did grow a spine when it came to amnesty...they do have limits, but, I agree, the limits are very high.

Can you imagine if McCain were president now, what a disaster the party would be in?


26 posted on 02/01/2009 10:07:54 AM PST by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: wartman

I didn’t miss a thing, but it sure seems that far too many missed the WOT.

It’s sad, really.


27 posted on 02/01/2009 10:08:16 AM PST by Gator113 ("Noli nothis permittere te terere.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BobL
Can you imagine if McCain were president now, what a disaster the party would be in?

Yep. This is a great time to reorganize the GOP -- get the Bush, McCain big spenders out of the party and return the party to it's limited government roots. Goldwater is rolling over in his grave at what Bush has turned the GOP into.
28 posted on 02/01/2009 10:16:10 AM PST by wartman (http://www.jeffwartman.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GinaLolaB

Heck - I’d be happy if he were my senator....both of ‘em.


29 posted on 02/01/2009 10:24:12 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wartman
His record is on par with LBJ spending

This point is well taken, but you want Sessions to explain his " hypocrisy" ? Other than he was supporting the leader of his party during war time, he has no defense.

I'll go with a hypocrite who is doing the right thing now, than a bunch of spiteful socialists.

By the way, wart man, its not like youre the only one who can see the truth. . Theres just not enough time to vote all the spineless followers out of office. Did you notice they have already been refuted at the voting booth?? Its not so courageous to dump on the dumped.

30 posted on 02/01/2009 10:34:38 AM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wartman
Your point about hypocrisy is well-taken, and it extends to the voters, including the devotees of this site.

I recall the passionate defenses here of Tom DeLay for paying considerable sums from his campaign fund to his daughter for catering, and to his wife as his "political consultant".

As long as Congressmen vote "right" on social issues, people here and generally give them a pass on their personal avarice.
31 posted on 02/01/2009 10:54:26 AM PST by kenavi ("...we must reject isolationism and its companion, protectionism." GWB, 1/15/09)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wartman

Yeah, just go ahead and go after Sessions. Let’s destroy and undermine him, okay? One of the few remaining Senators with working brain parts and principles, such as believing that defense spending is in a different category from family planning and Acorn subsidies. Whiff of Ron Paul nutjob here, and at the “site.”


32 posted on 02/01/2009 11:44:27 AM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wartman; Guenevere

How timely. Jeff Sessions makes sense, so they go after him. If it had not been for Jeff Sessions tirelessly going after Bush’s amnesty spending LOUDLY, we’d be a LOT further in debt.

Sessions is one of the few in government who is trying to save this disaster from happening.


33 posted on 02/01/2009 11:48:41 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wartman

“Which would be fantastic. But we need to take those to task who are responsible for doubling the national debt. “

Oh, get over it...that is NOT Sessions, and you know it. And if you don’t, you shouldn’t be spouting your ‘opinion’ on a blog. Because that is all it is. Sessions saved us billions fighting amnesty.


34 posted on 02/01/2009 11:51:48 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: La Lydia

“Yeah, just go ahead and go after Sessions. Let’s destroy and undermine him, okay? One of the few remaining Senators with working brain parts and principles, such as believing that defense spending is in a different category from family planning and Acorn subsidies. Whiff of Ron Paul nutjob here, and at the “site.”

Sessions just isn’t RINO enough to suit some. Has this author ever gone after McCain??


35 posted on 02/01/2009 11:53:43 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925; Foreigners 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
Oh, get over it...that is NOT Sessions, and you know it. And if you don’t, you shouldn’t be spouting your ‘opinion’ on a blog. Because that is all it is. Sessions saved us billions fighting amnesty.

And he cost us trillions fighting for more social welfare and entitlement spending.
36 posted on 02/01/2009 12:12:06 PM PST by wartman (http://www.jeffwartman.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wartman
And he cost us trillions fighting for more social welfare and entitlement spending.

Write an article about Bush, shmuckhead, since he was the President and LEADER. Sessions is fighting for us NOW, and only a phony Ron Paul Freak would waste any time on writing about his past fealty to the throne. I know the Democraps could care less about your argument.

After you do that, just go away.

37 posted on 02/01/2009 12:16:21 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wartman
Who is Jeff Wartman....

..and why should I care what he thinks?

38 posted on 02/01/2009 12:58:15 PM PST by Guenevere (..........".If you don't run, you won't win".....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nonstatist

Fighting for smaller government may be “wasting time” to you, but to those of us who believe in a limited government, it’s not.

Here are some facts:

George W. Bush is responsible for some of the largest increases in social welfare spending in the history of the United States. He doubled the national debt during his two terms, and left future generations holding the bill. You are a complete and total statist.


39 posted on 02/01/2009 2:23:50 PM PST by wartman (http://www.jeffwartman.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: wartman
George W. Bush is responsible for some of the largest increases in social welfare spending in the history of the United States. He doubled the national debt during his two terms, and left future generations holding the bill.

Keep repeating yourself, you stupid puppet. You havent got the courage to face up to the Democraps, so you pick an easy target. You libertines are phony frauds

40 posted on 02/01/2009 7:43:28 PM PST by Nonstatist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson