what started this birth certificate debacle?

I think that many of the people here are intelligent enough to focus on more than one issue at a time.

Intelligent people, of course there are, but the bc, hidden medical files, passports, school records, will be exposed, BUT the important matter now is the stimulus package. I don't believe for one minute you can't search on here and find 100,000 answers to the question you asked. Method of mass distraction won't work. Sorry, that bill is being opposed, strongly. Trust me, there are many people behind the scenes that are gathering evidence and have evidence. They won't reveal it on here, that is something you can take to the bank.

I hope that you are right and that there are people behind the scenes gathering evidence. It would be better for our country for us to get this whole natural born question publicly resolved. People need to be able to trust their government and Obama’s secretiveness is not helping at all.

I had no intention of distracting anyone from opposing the “stimulus bill”. I agree that opposing this bill is the most important issue that we can address right now.

That type of vulgar spending and government interference is what has got us into this mess. It infuriates me to see them trying to ram this bill down our throats, falsely claiming that it’s the only way to save our economy.

Now you're going in circles. I explained before the difference between OB's qualifications and the other presidents. If you're not going to do the reading, please drop the class. We don't allow repeat questions.

You really have run out of arguments. Either be creative or just admit you don't care about the constitutional requirements and you'll just let any foreign born popular person run because no one asked Eisenhower ot JFK or Nixon where they were born. Then you can announce your president on the people's choice award.

Anybody seen a birth certificate? Anyone? Nobody? Oh, I guess he's okay then.

Please send me a check for $100. I am erecting a plaque at his birthplace in Honiolulu as soon as we find out where it is.

Well, Sarah, I missed this thread on Friday. I see that the gang has really been giving you the treatment. This is an extremely tough audience and with very good reason: FR is heavily infiltrated with trolls and obots which makes us constitutionalists a bit gunshy about newbies. I had to prove myself a while back because I lurked for so long. So what is happening to you is not unusual. If you are a troll, it will be made clear soon enough. In the meantime, if you want to be taken seriously, I can only suggest that you avoid DU terms like “birther,” “truther,” “Obama derangement syndrome” as well as the terms that Polarik advised you about (”wingnut,” “tinfoil hat”) and stay away from vanities for awhile. They are not much appreciated and arouse suspicion. Also, if you are not a troll, you should avoid feeding trolls. I think you’ve already picked up on who they are: the ones who think that the Constitution should define NBC, who expect us to prove a negative about Obama’s eligibility while giving him a pass as though he is some precious flower which needs to be protected. They ooze illogic and try to insult the intelligence of constitutionalists every time an eligibility thread appears. In fact, they show up on these threads with supersonic speed every single time one is posted. The best thing to do is to simply ignore them and to not respond to them if they contact you. Oh, yes—try to use good spelling and grammar. Constitutionalists tend to appreciate that. If you are a sincere lover of the Constitution, I wish you well here!

Thank you so much! That was a great summary and good advice too. I especially agree with the part about illogical requests to prove a negative. It’s good to find someone with a similar way of thinking who understands the of the rules of logic.

I do love the Constitution and I am confident that others will believe that after I have been here for awhile.

I think you’re on the level, if that means anything to anyone. Starting off on FR by posting a vanity got some wheels turning in a lot of long-time freeper heads, as posting a vanity so early in the game about an inciendiary subjectlike B.O.’s eligibility violated certain long-standing FR protocols. But I noticed that you espouse constitutionalist principles, which causes me to believe
that you are what you say you are.

Have a greet week!

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.