Where do you draw the line in using the power of the state to discriminate against a religion? Is there a clearly defined point that says this one practice is OK and this is not?
Mine is convincing a jury that actions of an individual, a group, a corporation caused me harm.
Allowing freedom of religion for Islam will be to discriminate against other religions. You are standing up for an ideology that has NO concerns for the beliefs of anyone else.
Islam is not OK, look around the world.
Hey! Don’t argue with me about Islam, which is far more than simply a religion. I suppose if you lived during WWII and Nazism called itself a “religion” you would be all for allowing them to operate banks inside this nation too. If you’ll accept sharia banking now, then you’ll love sharia law later.