[Scanian]

“The guardians of whether he’s “constitutionally qualified” are the SCOTUS. They stuck their cowardly heads in the sand and let the issue go by unexamined. They abrogated their responsibility and completely violated the trust we the people place in them”

Do you have a sneaking suspicion that Roberts’ flub while administering the oath to the Usurper resulted from a guilty conscience?

[Kevmo]

Do you have a sneaking suspicion that Roberts’ flub while administering the oath to the Usurper resulted from a guilty conscience?
***Yes, but that and $4 will get me a cup of coffee.

[Golden Gate]

# 130 - Do you have a sneaking suspicion that Roberts’ flub while administering the oath to the Usurper resulted from a guilty conscience?

Fyi - That Was No Mistake - Roberts Sent a Message to History
Glenn Spencer of the American Patrol Report - Opinion -- January 22, 2009
http://www.americanpatrol.com/_WEB2009/090122.html

• FR Thread: That Was No Mistake Roberts Sent a Message to History

  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2170050/posts
  Thursday, January 22, 2009 9:15:37 PM · by Sammy67 · 120 replies · 2,649+ views

  AmericanPatrol ^ | 1/22/09

  On December 5, 2008, we said: "Questions have been raised as to whether Chief Justice John Roberts could administer the oath of office to a man who he believes may not be entitled. Chief Justice John G. Roberts will have to KNOW that Barack Hussein Obama II is eligible to 'enter on the execution of his office,' before he administers the Inaugural Oath of Office.'" The Chief Justice of the United States did not make a mistake when he flubbed the oath of office. He did not want to issue the oath to Obama because of his doubts. By failing...