[EternalVigilance]

"Of course, if Obama knows that he is not “a natural born Citizen” who never renounced his American citizenship, then he also knows that he and his henchmen have perpetrated numerous election-related frauds throughout the country—the latest, still-ongoing one a colossal swindle targeting the American people as a whole. If that is the case, his refusal “to be a witness against himself” is perfectly explicable and even defensible on the grounds of the Fifth Amendment. Howsoever justified as a matter of criminal law, though, Obama’s silence and inaction will not obviate the necessity for him to prove his eligibility for “the Office of President.” The Constitution may permit him to “take the Fifth;” but it will not suffer him to employ that evasion as a means to usurp the Presidency of the United States."

- Edwin Vieira, Jr.

[Kevmo]

The Constitution may permit him to “take the Fifth;” but it will not suffer him to employ that evasion as a means to usurp the Presidency of the United States.”
***I agree that this is what the constitution says. It’s a complete tragedy that those we entrust with upholding the constitution have sold us down the river. The evasion worked, unfortunately.

Dr. Taitz case Lightfoot v Bowen has disappeared from the docket - Why?
Wednesday, January 21, 2009 5:03:40 PM · 31 of 33
LucyT to unspun; Calpernia; Fred Nerks; null and void; pissant; george76; PhilDragoo; Candor7; MeekOneGOP; ..
All the cases on Obama’s eligibility, even the pending ones, have been removed from the SCOTUS website.
Ping again.

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies