A constitutional usurper cannot have constitutional authority. If he’s not qualified, his actions are unenforcable. Any actions taken to enforce his decisions are themselves unlawful.
A constitutional usurper cannot have constitutional authority. If he’s not qualified, his actions are unenforcable. Any actions taken to enforce his decisions are themselves unlawful.
***So that remains to be seen. Anyone who doesn’t like the law that Obama passes can challenge the law on this premise. And we all get to buy popcorn.
How would such a challenge manifest itself? Let’s say some company decides they don’t like his green initiative and files a lawsuit saying they’re not responsible to fulfill the law since he’s not an eligibile pres. The lawsuit is likely to get dismissed all the way up the line to the SCOTUS, the same SCOTUS who took a pass when they could have stopped this debacle. SCOTUS will likely dismiss the case without ever looking at it. Then what would be that company’s recourse?