Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: DuncanWaring
Oops...typo corrected.

Remember that takers of said oath are also legally required to refuse to obey illegal orders.

Uhmm....no. Those words are not in the oath. They are not in the oath I or my friends took. Look it up next time before you post, hmmmkay?

Perhaps you'll recall the "I was only following orders." defense has generally not been a winning strategy.

Yeah, well, neither is the "FU CO. I'm not doing that" strategy. Pretty sure the "FU President Sir" strategy would be a loser as well. Far more soldiers/sailors have been imprisoned, court martial, and even executed - in Western armies mind you - for NOT following orders, than Nazi's were for following them.

173 posted on 01/20/2009 11:48:24 PM PST by NucSubs ( Cognitive dissonance: Conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between beliefs and actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: NucSubs
I know very well what is and isn't in the oath, without looking it up.

Far more soldiers/sailors have been imprisoned, court martial, and even executed - in Western armies mind you - for NOT following orders, than Nazi's were for following them.

That'll be a faint comfort to Lt. William Calley.

176 posted on 01/21/2009 2:16:36 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson