Unfortunately, you jump to conclusions about the intent of a post. Mine was totally in jest, sarcasm even. But you, like many others at this site in recent months/years, cannot recognize it when you read it. I refuse to label a post as sarcasm if people are incapable of understanding it.
You said — “Unfortunately, you jump to conclusions about the intent of a post. Mine was totally in jest, sarcasm even. But you, like many others at this site in recent months/years, cannot recognize it when you read it. I refuse to label a post as sarcasm if people are incapable of understanding it.”
No, you don’t have to label it and I never said you needed to. I post what I did, because whether you know what you’re saying (which you say you do)..., there are other readers and posters (on Free Republic), who *do believe* these kinds of things (and this is from what I’ve read of a lot of posts on this subject).
It’s amazing what some posters think that these Justices can do.... LOL... (there’s the humor... :-) ...)
And so, even if it doesn’t apply to you, it certainly does apply to some readers and other posters.