Beam me to Planet Gore !
Posted on 01/08/2009 3:53:16 PM PST by EPW Comm Team
Politically Left Scientists Now Rejecting Climate Fears Global Warming ‘Consensus’ in Freefall More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) – Ranking Member, Environment and Public Works Committee
Speech Delivered on Senate Floor January 8, 2009
For Full Speech Click Here:
For Selected Highlights Click Here:
Senator Inhofe Speech Excerpt:
I have given over 12 floor speeches on the science of global warming. Today, I want to update my colleagues on some of the latest science that has not been reported in the mainstream media.
[...]
Many left-of-center scientists and environmental activists are now realizing that the so-called "consensus" on man-made global warming is not holding up.
It is becoming increasingly clear that skepticism about man-made global warming fear is not a partisan left vs. right issue. In fact, many scientists who are also progressive environmentalists believe climate fear promotion has "co-opted" or "hijacked" the green movement.
Huffington Post Features Article Demanding Apology from Gore
The left-wing blog Huffington Post surprised many by featuring an article on January 3, 2008, by Harold Ambler, demanding an apology from Gore for promoting unfounded global warming fears. The Huffington Post article accused Gore of telling "the biggest whopper ever sold to the public in the history of humankind" because he claimed the science was settled on global warming. The Huffington Post article titled "Mr. Gore: Apology Accepted" adds, "It is Mr. Gore and his brethren who are flat-Earthers," not the skeptics.
Again, it is not Jim Inhofe calling Gore a "flat-Earther," it is the left-wing blog Huffington Post calling him these things.
The Huffington Post article continues, "Let us neither cripple our own economy by mislabeling carbon dioxide a pollutant nor discourage development in the Third World, where suffering continues unabated, day after day."
Another left-of-center atmospheric scientist who has dissented on man-made climate fears is the UK’s Richard Courtney. Courtney, a UN IPCC expert reviewer and a UK-based climate and atmospheric science consultant, is a self-described socialist who also happens to reject man-made climate fears. Courtney declared in 2008 that there is "no correlation between the anthropogenic emissions of GHGs and global temperature."
Joining Courtney are many other progressive environmentalist scientists:
Former Greenpeace member and Finnish scientist Dr. Jarl R. Ahlbeck, a lecturer of environmental technology and a chemical engineer at Abo Akademi University in Finland who has authored 200 scientific publications, is also skeptical of man-made climate doom. Ahlbeck wrote in 2008, "Contrary to common belief, there has been no or little global warming since 1995 and this is shown by two completely independent datasets. But so far, real measurements give no ground for concern about a catastrophic future warming." (LINK)
Scientist and life-long liberal Democrat rejects climate fears
Life-long liberal Democrat Dr. Martin Hertzberg, a retired Navy meteorologist with a PhD in physical chemistry, also declared his dissent of warming fears in 2008. "As a scientist and life-long liberal Democrat, I find the constant regurgitation of the anecdotal, fear mongering clap-trap about human-caused global warming to be a disservice to science," Hertzberg wrote. "The global warming alarmists don't even bother with data! All they have are half-baked computer models that are totally out of touch with reality and have already been proven to be false," Hertzberg added. (LINK)
Ivy League-educated Geologist Dr. Robert Giegengack publicly announced he voted for Gore in 2000 and said he would do so again. But Giegengack does not agree with Gore’s science views and states that global warming does not even qualify as one of the top ten ENVIRONMENTAL problems facing the world, let alone one of the top problems. "In terms of [global warming's] capacity to cause the human species harm, I don't think it makes it into the top 10," Giegengack said in an interview in the May/June 2007 issue of the Pennsylvania Gazette. (LINK)
‘Intellectual blasphemy’
Other liberal environmental scientists and activists are now joining Giegengack.
Alexander Cockburn, a maverick journalist who leans left on most topics, lambasted the alleged global-warming consensus on the political Web site CounterPunch.org, arguing that there's no evidence yet that humans are causing the rise in global temperature. After publicly speaking to reject man-made warming fears, Cockburn wrote on February 22, 2008, "I have been treated as if I have committed intellectual blasphemy." Cockburn harshly critiqued the political left for embracing climate alarmism. "This turn to climate catastrophism is tied into the decline of the left, and the decline of the left’s optimistic vision of altering the economic nature of things through a political program. The left has bought into environmental catastrophism because it thinks that if it can persuade the world that there is indeed a catastrophe, then somehow the emergency response will lead to positive developments in terms of social and environmental justice," Cockburn wrote. [See: A July 2007 and a March 2008 report detail how skeptical scientists have faced threats and intimidation - LINK & LINK ]
CNN – not exactly a bastion of conservatism – had yet another of its meteorologists dissent from warming fears. Chad Myers, a meteorologist for 22 years and certified by the American Meteorological Society, spoke out against anthropogenic climate claims on CNN in December. "You know, to think that we could affect weather all that much is pretty arrogant," Myers said during "Lou Dobbs Tonight" on December 18, 2008. "Mother Nature is so big, the world is so big, the oceans are so big – I think we’re going to die from a lack of fresh water or we’re going to die from ocean acidification before we die from global warming, for sure," Myers explained.
Myers joins fellow CNN meteorologist Rob Marciano, who compared Gore’s film to ‘fiction’ in 2007, and CNN anchor Lou Dobbs who just said of global warming fear promotion on January 5, "It's almost a religion without any question."
Warming activists ‘have effectively been co-opted’
Denis G. Rancourt, professor of physics and an environmental science researcher at the University of Ottawa, believes the global warming campaign does a disservice to the environmental movement. Rancourt wrote on February 27, 2007, "Promoting the global warming myth trains people to accept unverified, remote, and abstract dangers in the place of true problems that they can discover for themselves by becoming directly engaged in their workplace and by doing their own research and observations." (LINK). Rancourt wrote, "I argue that by far the most destructive force on the planet is power-driven financiers and profit-driven corporations and their cartels backed by military might; and that the global warming myth is a red herring that contributes to hiding this truth. In my opinion, activists who, using any justification, feed the global warming myth have effectively been co-opted, or at best neutralized." "Global warming is strictly an imaginary problem of the First World middle class," Rancourt added.
Perhaps the biggest shock to the global warming debate was the recent conversion of renowned French geophysicist Dr. Claude Allegre from being a believer in dangerous man-made warming fears to being a skeptic. Allegre, a former French Socialist Party leader and a member of both the French and U.S. Academies of Science, was one of the first scientists to sound global warming fears 20 years ago, but he now says the cause of climate change is "unknown." He ridiculed what he termed the "prophets of doom of global warming" in a September 2006 article. (LINK) Allegre has authored more than 100 scientific articles, written 11 books, and received numerous scientific awards including the Goldschmidt Medal from the Geochemical Society of the United States. He now believes the global warming hysteria is motivated by money. "The ecology of helpless protesting has become a very lucrative business for some people!" he explained.
‘Hijacked’ environmental left
Left-wing Professor David Noble of Canada's York University has joined the growing chorus of disenchanted liberal activists. Noble now believes that the movement has "hyped the global climate issue into an obsession." Noble wrote a May 8, 2007, essay entitled "The Corporate Climate Coup" which details how global warming has "hijacked" the environmental left and created a "corporate climate campaign," "divert[ing] attention from the radical challenges of the global justice movement." (LINK)
Botanist Dr. David Bellamy, a famed UK environmental campaigner, former lecturer at Durham University, and host of a popular UK TV series on wildlife, converted from believer to a skeptic about global warming. Bellamy, a committed environmentalist, now says that shift cost him his career at the BBC. Bellamy said in 2008, "My opinion is that there is absolutely no proof that carbon dioxide has anything to do with any impending catastrophe. The science has, quite simply, gone awry. In fact, it’s not even science any more, it’s anti-science. There’s no proof, it’s just projections and if you look at the models people such as Gore use, you can see they cherry pick the ones that support their beliefs." (LINK)
Geologist Peter Sciaky echoes this growing backlash of left-wing activists about global warming. Sciaky, who describes himself as a "liberal and a leftist" wrote on June 9, 2007, "I do not know a single geologist who believes that [global warming] is a man-made phenomenon." Ecologist Dr. Patrick Moore, a Greenpeace founding member, has also joined the ranks of the dissenters. “It is clear the contention that human-induced CO2 emissions and rising CO2 levels in the global atmosphere are the cause of the present global warming trend is a hypothesis that has not yet been elevated to the level of a proven theory. Causation has not been demonstrated in any conclusive way," Moore, the chief scientist for Greenspirit, wrote in 2006.
Again, to repeat, it is becoming increasingly clear that skepticism about man-made global warming fear is not a partisan left vs. right issue. It is a scientific question and the promoters of global warming fears now realize they have significantly overreached.
#
To continue reading Senator Inhofe’s full speech, click here:
Hell yeah
I was wondering how long it would take the leftists to reverse course in order to let Obama off the hook, so that he would not have to sign Kyoto.
Pretty soon all we are going to be left with is the mental illness of Global Warming Syndrome(GWS). Fortunately like BDS, it only afflicts liberals. Which in and of itself can be a good thing.
So obvious. Global warming, abortion, health care, social security and stem-cell research are nothing more than scare tactic “gotcha” politics created by the left to hammer the Republicans with, year after year. I am also reading that they are now in doubt about the viability of stem-cell research. They are clearing the way for Obama.
Yep, add another radical leftist special interest group of Obama voters about to be jilted by the messiah.
The house of cards is coming down.
Obama hasn’t even taken office and already he’s reversed Global Warming.
I’m cautiously optimistic that Obama will solve the Global Warming crisis the way Bill Clinton solved homelessness and AIDS. By ignoring it completely and having the lapdogs in the press do the same.
Does this mean we can drill off shore?
After all this is over, one man will be standing alone.
And that man will be...ALGORE!
He’ll be in a straightjacket, but he’ll be standing.
Yea but he meant well, is what the MSM will say.
(I think I am gonna go watch South Park episode 'Smug Alert' now......;)
Scams only work as long as there are willing idiots to fall for them.
In this case - a bunch of folks who don’t deserve the title of “scientist” jumped on a bandwagon with very little evidence (evidence that was cooked up/manipulated/misrepresented).
I remember in school many years ago, that science was suppose to be based on evidence and theories around that evidence. Hypothesis comes when the early evidence comes in - but not enough evidence to have any certainty. Theory comes next, when a body of evidence points towards a conclusion, then when All evidence is in, and through verifiable and controlled testing and experimenting is done with repeated proofs by others, it eventually can be called a law.
These so-called scientists in this case took what was a very weak hypothesis and ran with it proclaiming it law. Not very scientific.
Al Gore - I can understand how he fell for it - he is an idiot leftist who has no clue on how to verify evidence (and doesn’t really care as long has he gets his leftist ways). But for folks who claim to be scientists (thus supposedly well-versed in the scientific method) to fall for this hook, line, and sinker - they should be permanently discredited and barred from teaching, and from any grants of any kind for any scientific purpose.
And for those who cooked up the books - hang them for fraud.
these scientists know full well global warming is a hoax. they’re only on the bandwagon because that’s where the $$ are..dry up the $$ and you’ll see them bail faster than occupants of a sinking rowboat in the middle of the ocean..
The cheese stands alone.
Guess the Carbon Credit business is DOA...;-)
Maybe Gore can give back the money he made from his fictional documentary, his Oscar and his Nobel Prize and its $ award. Ya think ?
The AGW hoax has exposed the watermelons for what they are.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.