Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Jaime2099; BroJoeK

” That is not science either, pure garbage. “
The issue is not whether it is ‘science’ the issue is whether it is TRUE. Is it?

“The rate of decay is unpredictable,”
Why do you say that?
C14 is different ratios in different situations? Why?
If you dont know, why do you dispute the standard explanation?

” no one knows how old the earth is.”
If you dont know, why no go with this evidence as the best estimate (4b years)?

“Fantasy of fantasies is carbon dating.”
There are other radioactive decay mechanisms as well. Do you disagree with ALL forms of radioactive decay based dating? Why?


978 posted on 01/07/2009 12:29:38 PM PST by WOSG (Obama - a born in the USA socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG

[[There are other radioactive decay mechanisms as well. Do you disagree with ALL forms of radioactive decay based dating? Why?]]

Assumptions- plain and simple- you’ll find a nice little list of links showing hte problems with many of the methods of dating in this thread that I posted- I have more for hte more obscure dating methods as well.


992 posted on 01/07/2009 1:04:08 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 978 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson