Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138

[[You keep saying this, but neither you nor anyone else has produced a sustainable argument to support the claim.]]

Mmm Yes we have- We’ve explained it in detail, it’s just that you refuse to acknowledge the biological difference and still insist that mutations can bring about the trillions of upward self assembling non species specific info needed- and you insist this without a shred of scientific evidence to back up your claim-

There IS a seperation biologically betqween micro and macro evolution

[[From the point of view of evolutionary theory, nearly all evolution proceeds at a micro rate.]]

No it doesn’t (Although I see you’ve left yourself an ‘out’ by declaring ‘nearly all’). Macroe is a far different animal than micro biologically speaking.


867 posted on 01/06/2009 7:22:09 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 778 | View Replies ]


To: CottShop
"Macroe is a far different animal than micro biologically speaking."

Not really. Under the microscope most cells look the same.

870 posted on 01/06/2009 7:30:13 PM PST by NicknamedBob (If you translate Pi into base 43 notation, it will contain this statement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 867 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson