I’m sorry CottShop if my post offended you. BTW, I share your view of Macroevolution, FWIW. And certainly, “The TRUTH stands on it’s own accord.” People who deny it cannot abolish it.
No no- it didn’t offend- just wanted to be clear about what is presented here- Macroevos are always claiming Crationists don’t bring ‘science to the table’, and that simply isn’t true- it’s just that they systematically ignore what is broguht to the table, while glomming onto moot irrelevent issues (like my spelling for instance) in the hopes that we’ll be distracted from the central issues that were presented, thinking perhaps that because we’re not accreditted in some scientific journal, that we must hterefore all be dimwitted laypeople who don’t recognize silly arguments, and unsupported claims based on assumptions and a priori beliefs when we see them- and that’s only when these discussions turn into spitting matches- myself being to blame as well- but the science is brouight before the discussions get out of hand