[js1138]

It's not a hypothesis that I make, but it is certainly a possibility.

The question is whether God can be studied ysing the methods of science. I see a lot of discussion of science "excluding" God, but I never see any practical research proposals that include God.

[CottShop]

[[The question is whether God can be studied ysing the methods of science.]]

Who said GOD has to be studied? Forensic scientists don’t Study the intellegent creators behind the scenes- they study the RESULTS of the intelligent causer- They look for, and discover the tell-tale fingerprints of the intelligence behind the scenes- in NO way do they have to prove or even study the intelligent causer

[ZX12R]

The question is whether God can be studied ysing the methods of science. I see a lot of discussion of science "excluding" God, but I never see any practical research proposals that include God.

I'll hypothesize that science is the study of all God's works. It is not a scientific hypothesis, but at the same time, it doesn't seems unreasonable either. It would only be characterized as unreasonable to someone with a particular agenda. The mirror image is those that deny all scientific discoveries. There is a symmetry to the crevo/evo debaters, and they won't like me pointing that out.