To: ZX12R
I mostly lurk here, and scan through the crevo/evo wildfires, and to me they are sometimes entertaining and almost never enlightening. The majority of the participants are incapable of enlightenment on any point. But keep up the good fight, for whatever reason. Maybe one side or the other will make headway eventually, but I'm not optimistic. On the rare occasions that you find something of value, what kinds of arguments are you impressed with?
712 posted on
01/06/2009 9:28:34 AM PST by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
On the rare occasions that you find something of value, what kinds of arguments are you impressed with?
Ones, that in my opinion, are based on a fair assessment of the facts at hand. And they could come from either side. There are some undeniable facts concerning evolution theory, but I think it's also disingenuous to suggest it explains the evolution of life perfectly, as it is. I see no reason to exclude science or God from the debate. The real answer is still out there.
721 posted on
01/06/2009 9:56:05 AM PST by
ZX12R
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson