And you can find multiple rebuttals for everything on that page. That you post this information knowing that it is most likely false makes one wonder exactly what your motives are.
No sir- YOU post the rebuttals, and then I’ll post hte Re-Rebuttals- For you to claim what was posted was false shows that you’ve NOT investigated this issue very carefully, and apparently have no desire to look OBJECTIVELY at hte situation. Behe wrote his Rebuttal to Miller after the trial since he was NOT afforded the common descency to Rebuttal him durign hte trial- You’ll find his Rebuttal online, and IF you care to look at it OBJECTIVELY and without bias, you’ll HAVE to cede that Behe has a point which can’t be refuted- infact He points out just how deceitful Miller was during his ‘expert testimony’ durign that trial-
[[And you can find multiple rebuttals for everything on that page. That you post this information knowing that it is most likely false makes one wonder exactly what your motives are.]]
And you can find manty Re-Rebuttals for every ‘rebuttal’ that has been posted, and hte fact that you post your claim knowing full well this is the case shows that you prefer bias and subjective opinions over objective evidneces which Behe and others have made public- it makes one not ownder about your motives, but only goes to reinforce the fact that gagain, you don’t really care abotu objective facts- You only care that people ‘stick it to’ those they dissagree with- regardless of how factual their
rebuttals’ really are!