js post 471:I did specify applying the methods of science.
No, you said the FINDINGS of science are found the same by everyone who applies the methods of science, and that is simply not true.
Some things in science are consistent where ever science is done, but science is replete with different FINDINGS by interpreting the evidence and global warming is just one of those examples.
Even with that, there is no consistency in the recording of the temperature data over the years used to determine whether the planet is warming or not.
Global warming deniers are not using crap science. The crappy science is what the global warming alarmists were depending on.
Since you made that comment, is it safe to presume that you buy into global warming?
Remind me again, what field of science is your degree in?
You should know enough about weather to know the difference between weather and climate. Five or ten years of data are not enough to prove or disprove climate change.
The core of the climate change story is found in the behavior of carbon dioxide. It does not predict the year or even the decade when climate change will be irreversibly accepted, but it does determine the heat economy of the planet.