What *facts*?
Should Scripture be interpreted in light of the current interpretation of the data which is more likely to be wrong than not?
That still doesn’t qualify *science* as an accurate tool to interpret Scripture with.
St. Augustine spoke of the harm caused to religion by people who insisted the earth is flat.
In time, the church was damaging religion by insisting the sun revolves around the earth. Took centuries to recover from that fiasco.
Most importantly, God is Spirit. He is not within the domain of science which limits itself by methodological naturalism to that which is natural. Nature is but a subset of "all that there is" - and "all that there is" is God's creation, it is not God the Creator of it.
Moreover, it is not enough to know the Scripture - the text - one must know the power of God to receive the words of God. One must have "ears to hear." Jesus Christ is the power of God and the wisdom of God.
But unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the power of God, and the wisdom of God. - I Corinthians 1:24
But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know [them], because they are spiritually discerned. I Corinthians 2:13-14
I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20