Yeah, it was a smartass answer, and unhelpful, and unilluminating.
If that is how YOU need to describe it have at it. I can tell you it was filled with seeds of truth regarding the fact that Christ is the key to the proof that evolution is a lie. Ever read the parable of the sower?????
>
You have claimed to be Christian.
More than claimed, my FRiend. I AM a Christian. A practising one.
Then you would know why I used the words I did the majority are found in the Bible.
>
And while you think my response was smartass
No, I *know* it was a smartass response. And it did you no credit at all.
HA the evolutionary dogma is all about marking credit to the best modeler. I am not hunting for credit but I have found to 'quote' Christ does draw the ire of the majority.
>
have you not read about Christ cursing a ‘fig’ tree? And wasn’t the Garden Party in a ‘fig’ grove.
And exactly what does that have to do with anything? Are you comparing yourself to Christ? That’s weird! Do you belong to some sort of cult or something?
And you are claiming I have no credit? I did NOT write what is WRITTEN and I am told that the WORD was GOD. Now why would these things be WRITTEN preserved through our flesh time? To be ignored? You asked what the tracking the protecting of that blood line to Christ had to to with proving evolution as lie. And then you do not know enough of what the WORD says to then accuse me comparing myself to Christ or being in a cult. WHOOOOOo How do you follow somebody when you don't even know what they said?
> If that is how YOU need to describe it have at it. I can tell you it was filled with seeds of truth regarding the fact that Christ is the key to the proof that evolution is a lie. Ever read the parable of the sower?????
I’m not willing to play guessing games with obscure hints. If you have something of substance to contribute, I am all ears. I’ve asked a plain question in hope of a plain answer. If you can do that, fine. If you can’t, also fine.
For now, we’re done.