[GodGunsGuts]

I'm not sure what you're driving at. But like I said, I have read a number of polls that all show the same trend. The ideology of science is currently controlled by Darwinist-materialists. It should therefore come as no surprise that the higher a scientist progresses through the ranks of the science establishment, the greater the chance that they will become thoroughgoing materialists.

[tacticalogic]

I'm not sure what you're driving at. But like I said, I have read a number of polls that all show the same trend. The ideology of science is currently controlled by Darwinist-materialists. It should therefore come as no surprise that the higher a scientist progresses through the ranks of the science establishment, the greater the chance that they will become thoroughgoing materialists.

Science doesn't have an ideology. Scientists do, and they aren't a homongenous collective. Many of them are people of good faith and character.

[tacticalogic]

I'm not sure what you're driving at. But like I said, I have read a number of polls that all show the same trend. The ideology of science is currently controlled by Darwinist-materialists. It should therefore come as no surprise that the higher a scientist progresses through the ranks of the science establishment, the greater the chance that they will become thoroughgoing materialists.

If that's the conclusion we come to, then the result will be to discourage people of faith from pursuing scientific professions if they are so inclined, and the situation will just get progressively worse.

Making broad generalizations about scientists based on this data leaves those of good faith in the scientific community in the position of being viewed with mistrust within their profession because of their religious beliefs, and within the religious community because of their profession.