[[That’s on Ken ham’s list of arguments that creationists should not use.]]
First of all, I am not a big fan of Ham- Secondly, Ken Ham isn’t the voice of ID, thirdly, Christians absolutely CAN use hte second law with confidence and valid credibility because as you’ll see on Wallace’s site- the argument by Macroevo’s simply is NOT a valid arguement to make, and hte second law STILL means Macroevolution can not happen which you’ll discover by readign the link provided, as well as the links throughout hte article. The accusation that ‘Christians simply don’t understand the second law’ “Properly” is a bogus claim, and when the claim is investigated, it is foudn that it is apparently the Macroevos who do not understand hte law very well, and beleive that a snowflake somehow validifies Trillions upon trillions of upward moving and increasing self assembling complexities that somehow totally escape the second law at every single step of hte way apparently.
They can use it all they want, but they will be incorrect.