[CottShop]

[[Apparently it’s not possible to get a direct answer. It’s going to get taken out of context and restated in a form that provides an opportunity to protheletize.]]

you were given answers- What more do you demand? you know it’s goign to turn into preaching how? ID doesn’t posit who or what the intellgience is- they simply forensically examine the evidence and produce the results that show nature can not do the things we witness in biology- Don’t worry Tactic- Yuo can assign all kinds of watchdogs to make sure those ‘criminal’ ID teachers don’t stray fro mthe strict science and start prosthelizing (sp?) beyond the science like the Evos have done for 150 years now. I’m sure ya’ll will be quite diligent in that regard. You worry too much

[tacticalogic]

If you go back through the history of the exchange, you'll note that the question was asked in the context of claims of contemporary medical miracles, and invariably answered in the context of biblical accounts of miracles.

I do understand the methodology. The problem is the conflict between particular religous beliefs and scientific theory. One solution to the problem is to get everyone involved to adopt those religious beliefs.

If a particular line of inquiry is not contributing to a particular solution then you pursue a different line of inquiry if you want to get that solution to work.