Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: metmom; CottShop; tpanther; Fichori
[metmom to js1138] You mean that Darwin's theory could be classified as metaphor?

Yes, that's exactly what he's saying. He did not remember that he had stringently affirmed those propositions to be "all true" back in 2007. Upon seeing them again yesterday, he immediatly said they were "utter nonsense" and "metaphorical". Since those Malthusian-style propositions of Darwin's are the the very foundation of Natural Selection, js1138 is thus saying that Darwinism is either utter nonsense, or a metaphor.

1,125 posted on 01/08/2009 5:46:12 AM PST by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Darwinism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1122 | View Replies ]


To: Ethan Clive Osgoode
Yes, that's exactly what he's saying [Darwin's theory could be classified as metaphor ].

Since truth is a word best avoided in science, then it makes perfect sense.

1,129 posted on 01/08/2009 5:54:34 AM PST by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson