Except in the past the mods have sided with people who make that request and they may have this time, depending on the mod.
So how does that prove he’s lying?
And why don’t you ping him when accusing him of something like that. The mods DO support pinging someone if you’re talking about them, especially if you’re saying something bad about them, something your posting history shows you consistently ignore.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1994092/posts?page=156#156
“I would suggest both of you drop the whack-a-troll routine. BTW, Copernicus, it is considered proper forum ettiquitte to ping someone when you are mentioning them in a post - especially if you are saying something negative about them.”
No moderator has ever told me not to post to GGG. I have been in flame wars where the mods said knock it off.
Read the Kevmo post. Thick skin is recommended.
I’m not lying. And JSXXXX knows it. But it isn’t strictly the mods directive telling us to stay away from one another that keeps me from replying to JSXXXX. What keeps me from replying to him is the fact that I lost all respect for him when he went behind the scenes to convince unspespecting FReepers to go to Jim Robinson to get me banned over my CONSERVATIVE position re: AIDS (not to mention all the threads he deliberately heated up in such a way to ensure they got pulled).
So how does that prove he’s lying?
***It doesn’t. Maybe I shoulda given GGG a higher rating of confidence ;-)