Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: NinoFan
You are right. We're not going to get to the bottom of this.

I don't know what else I can do. I have posted information from the original article, and still the facts are being twisted and distorted.

But I guess that's just creation "science" as usual. It just is unable to accept evidence that goes contrary to belief. In fact its whole reason for existence seems to be to advocate and defend beliefs that are contrary to evidence.

Maybe tomorrow I'll scan the article and post it so folks can see what the facts really are. In the meantime, there is only so much nonsense I can tolerate in one day, so its Miller time.

Some of you other creationists really should take a look at these issues and weigh in. Cottshop is making your side look really bad, and your silence is tacit agreement with what he claims.

643 posted on 12/29/2008 5:36:39 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies ]


To: Coyoteman

[[I don’t know what else I can do. I have posted information from the original article, and still the facts are being twisted and distorted.]]

Answer hte question Coyote- was AAR shown to be wrong? (You made hte admission earlier, but now apparently are tryign to cover it over with more false accusations)- Admit it, and we’ll ‘be at hte bottom of this’ in no time.

[[But I guess that’s just creation “science” as usual. It just is unable to accept evidence that goes contrary to belief. In fact its whole reason for existence seems to be to advocate and defend beliefs that are contrary to evidence.]]

You must live on another planet- How many more links do you want to ignore that show just hte opposite? I’ve got tons of em- Do you actually beleive what you state? Honestly?

[[Some of you other creationists really should take a look at these issues and weigh in. Cottshop is making your side look really bad, and your silence is tacit agreement with what he claims.]]

They’re looking, and they’re thinking that the lady doth protest too much Coyoteman- That lady being you. If your only defense is to project your own shortcomings onto the opposition, then your defense is in pretty bad shape-

[[Maybe tomorrow I’ll scan the article and post it so folks can see what the facts really are.]]

I see you completely ignored my last post to you- per usual- I already posted what the FACTS are, and exposed the blatant misrepresentations by both you and the feller who wrote that clueless ‘rebuttle’


645 posted on 12/29/2008 5:44:23 PM PST by CottShop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies ]

To: Coyoteman

“Some of you other creationists really should take a look at these issues and weigh in. Cottshop is making your side look really bad, and your silence is tacit agreement with what he claims. “

No offense, but this sounds like you are egging people on. If it’s really so intolerable, one would think you’d avoid doing so.


649 posted on 12/29/2008 5:56:35 PM PST by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson