[CottShop]

Well let’s see coyote- which was ‘right’? The Radiometric dating? Or the AMS? To know that- you NEED to know the exact ages of the fossils being dated- BUT, you ASSUME you know the age because one method with all it’s assumptions and a priori belief is used - but when another method comes along that contradicts those findings- well by golly, that one must be wrong-

Keep posting- it just further shows how rediculously a priori your assumptions really are, and exposes the fact that ALL the dating methods have SERIOUS flaws- Spin it however how like- but it boils down to the fact that they are all plagued with serious problems beyond 10,000 years or so.

[Coyoteman]

Well let’s see coyote- which was ‘right’? The Radiometric dating? Or the AMS? To know that- you NEED to know the exact ages of the fossils being dated,

Again you prove my points about being anti-science and unqualified to comment in these areas.

AMS is radiometric dating! It is being used to dispute amino acid racemization dating, which has been shown to be inaccurate in a number of instances.

And these are human bones being dated, not fossils.

See, you really don't know what you are talking about, and you prove it with every post. Keep it up!