Your responses have amply demonstrated all of the points I made.
lol- Yep-
We ‘illustrated’ your points with the facts- which incidently are devestating to the claim that Macroevolution hypothesis is based on scientific facts and evidences when they clearly are nothign but ASSUMPTIONS based on a priori beliefs- Got another website which counters every single claim about DNA made by the lying and half-truth telling sites like talkorigins and pandas thumb- Care to read it? It’s a real eye-opener to htose willing to objectively look at the actual EVIDENCE and not get swayed by petty lame accusaitons and wild claims by sites liek htose I mentioned. Will bem ore than happy to post htem if yas like?
Sorry, but we’re not “Nitpicking” The hypothesis of Macroevolution- what we’re doing is major surgery- exposing the hypothesis for hte cancer it really is, and exposing hte lies and deciets that are so commonly touted as ‘overwhelming evidence’, and exposing just how silly it is to cling to something that is so rife with holes that it has no chance in hell of floating.