[CE2949BB]

And by "scientist" you mean "credentialed propagandist."

If you ever have cancer, you'll thank the army of scientists that are working to vanquish that monster.

Is this what conservatism is nowadays? Knee-jerk anti-science?

[metmom]

Is this what conservatism is nowadays? Knee-jerk anti-science?

If conservativism = anti-science then we can rightly deduce that science = liberal?

Is that why you won't touch the issue of the humanity of the HUMAN embryo?

[editor-surveyor]

If I ever have cancer, I will go to what works, which is proper nutrition, and God's given herbal cures, which work far better than the alopathic two-step that masquerades as "science."

"Is this what conservatism is nowadays? Knee-jerk anti-science?"

We gladly embrace real science, but evolution, and alopathy, are far from science.

[Coyoteman]

Is this what conservatism is nowadays? Knee-jerk anti-science?

This thread is a prime example.

Yet folks get so incensed when they are accused of being "anti-science."

What they want to do is pick and choose among various fields of science, selecting those results they agree with -- even though the different branches of science all use the same methods.

Some sciences, because they produce the wrong results, are selected for their special attention, to be nitpicked by those least qualified to do so. It has gotten to the point where fields of science that they disagree with are claimed to not be science at all.

Black is white. White is black. Creation "science" is science and fundamentalists are pro-science.