I hear you've actually read Alamo-Girl's and my book, Don't Let Science Get You Down, Timothy. May God bless you for that! I further gather that you think the character, "Froggie," is very weak. I'd love to know why. The important thing about Froggie is that he is a composite character, drawn from various FReepers with whom A-G and I have been corresponding for years (most of whom are long gone by now), whose "lines" were drawn from the actual replies of actual FReepers. The common selection factor for Froggie's viewpoint is the materialist, doctrinaire Darwinist concept of reality that Timothy seeks to refute.
So if you think we've been "unfair" to Froggie, and want to debate the issue, bring it on! We'll be glad to answer you point for point.
Seems a better thing to do than to complain about hostility to your theory that the Shroud is a fraud.
I always kinda wondered why Soliton shied away from debating you two on the topic.
And again, I get to bump your great book,
“Don’t Let Science Get You Down, Timothy”
Thank you so much for the ping, dearest sister in Christ! And yes indeed, I look forward to discussing any of Soliton’s comments about our book!