I am reluctant to get into this.
You wrote and posted the article. The article contains no real evidence or proof that our Savior’s birth date is precisely December 25th (the best you got to was “late December). Then, YOU begin demanding evidence from other people that the date is NOT the 25th. Interesting methodology you have there. It seems to me that YOU have the burden of proof, here, and YOU have PROVEN nothing. You have given your opinion, just as the rest of us have.
PS - My “so what” refers to the fact that it doesn’t really matter whether we now know the EXACT, precise, day when Christ was born. What matters is that we celebrate His birth.
Please lighten up a bit.
You need to read more carefully. I stated OPENLY that I could not PROVE that December 25th was the precise date. However, I think I made a strong case that it is, based on Scripture and history. The article gave evidence.
Others, who responded with “no” and “probably not” should not be offended that I ask if they have evidence.
“No” is not a very compelling argument.