For one to be a ‘natural born citizen’ of the USA one must be born of parents that were BOTH American citizens at the time of the birth. Just being born in the USA does not mean that one is automatically a ‘natural-born citizen’. Now in the case of John McCain his lawyers have argued that since the Canal Zone was under US jurisdiction at the time of his birth in 1936 and that McCain’s parents were both American citizens that John McCain is therefore a natural-born American citizen which you have to be to be ELIGIBLE to be POTUS. The contention by Donfrio is that Obama was born in Hawaii but that because his father was a British national at the time (from Kenya) that makes Obama ineligible to assume the Presidency.
And just where is that defined in law?
The contention by Donfrio is that Obama was born in Hawaii but that because his father was a British national at the time (from Kenya) that makes Obama ineligible to assume the Presidency.
Donofrio's contention is that in order to be a natural born U.S. citizen you must be born in the U.S. or on U.S. territory and both parents must be U.S. citizens. McCain was actually born in Panama so according to Donofrio he doesn't qualify.