I don’t.
No one, much less me, is asking you to bend to my opinions. I did ask you if you deny that you repeatedly stated “there was no room for argument” on this issue; that is quite different from pressuring you to agree with any point and you have not responded to that.
That’s fine. It was just a suggestion for a way you might evaluate your analysis.
All I suggested was that it was uninformed to declare that your opinion was conclusive, indeed, that there was “no room for argument.” And, even then, the only reason I commented was because such posts only add to the huge mountain of constitutional ignorance out there.
I simply wanted to point out that use of a term in a constitutional provision is NOT the same as that term being defined, and it’s not helpful to proceed as if it is.
That is all.
Ok, I see your point........but please.......get over yourself. We’re not contributing to the body of academic literature or base of research.........I don’t want my posts to be peer-reviewed........they’re just posts, for Snoopy’s sake........if I want to be analyzed and critiqued, I’ll send my opinions to my superiors in DC or Baltimore.
Now, my suggestion to you is to join me in this lovely bottle of merlot and forget for an evening that we will soon have a historical and genetic embarassment as a president.