1 posted on
11/20/2008 3:46:28 AM PST by
dascallie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
To: dascallie
I wouldn't think that they would rule on Obama's eligibility. I would think that they would kick it back to New Jersey saying that they Sec of State did not perform her duties in not thoroughly determining all the candidates eligibilities.
To: dascallie
The case originally sought, pre-election, to have the names of Barack Obama, John McCain, and Roger Calero removed from New Jersey ballots...
96 posted on
11/20/2008 6:59:20 AM PST by
TankerKC
(I'm waiting for my government ration of hope.)
To: dascallie
Let me end the suspense. SCOTUS will dodge the issue by declaring it not in their jurisdiction.
To: dascallie
Don’t forget, this court is still five liberals and four conservatives.
Pray without ceasing!
105 posted on
11/20/2008 7:31:23 AM PST by
editor-surveyor
(Obama - not just an empty suit - - A Suit Bomb invading the White House)
To: dascallie
To: dascallie
A completely private affair conference? Why is that? Whatever happened to “the public’s right to know”???
Oh wait. I keep forgetting. That only applies when it’s a Republican or a non-leftist involved. DemocRats deserve their privacy from the prying eyes of the people.
Got it.
119 posted on
11/20/2008 7:51:51 AM PST by
XenaLee
To: dascallie
They should take it up.
A birth certificate needs to be offered up to the satisfaction of the court and people.
I never heard of such trouble taken as this when all Obama has to do is make the birth certificate public.
Takes Obama all of 5 minutes to mail one priority mail to the courts I would think.
128 posted on
11/20/2008 9:15:16 AM PST by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-27 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson