Regarding the “oddities” on Schlussel’s site:
First of all the DLN# is NOT the Selective Service number. You have no idea what your DLN# is unless you request it with the FOIA. It is an internal data locating number only.
It is an 11 digit number starting with a 2 digit year of registration. It does not appear on any SS card or documents you may own.
The registration form DLN # on Debbie Schlussel’s site has simply been photoshopped to remove the leading number 8 from the DLN on the original registration form. Just download the photo and do a few “sharpen” operations to bring out the background. I used Irfanview. It’s pretty clear the background has been whited out removing the leading number, before the blue “A” was added just above where the initial small number 8 once was. If the leading “8” had not been washed out there would be no disagreement between the registration form and the computer record.
DLN numbers are 11 digits long - the registration form only has 10 digits. Without the DLN number discrepency, there would be no real issue. Looks like a case of a dirty tricks.
This was a deliberate hoax or deception. Wonder who did it?
Here’s what I am talking about:
and
http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/4085/obamaselectiveservicerevc6.jpg
Note the removal, in rectangular blocks, of much of the open areas on this form. Why was this done? Because then there would be no contrast to reveal the removal of the number 8 from the DLN. A careful job of deception, but not professional enough to avoid detection. You can still wonder about the other small oddities like the stamp, but the main case, that this registration form copy was faked in 2008 is not true. It was produced in 1980, just like it says.
Don’t believe it? Check out the doctored photo published on Debbie Schlussel’s website - download it, use sharpen function a few times to bring out the background and draw your own conclusions.
Welcome to FR. Is that you, Rahm?
Don’t you think it might not be real bright for someone to alter the document when it now is available (finally) via FOIA request.
A better way than blowing smoke, if you want to refute this, is to obtain another copy from SS.
Just so you both know, Ken Woods signed up today to let us know that the messup with Hussein’s card is not his fault but someone trying to make it look bogus. BTW, this is Ken Wood’s sole commeont on FR.
It would be interesting if someone could critique his critique. ‘Cause it looks to me as though KW is saying that someone messed with a legitimate card to make it look bogus, when Hussein is really as innocent and pure as the driven snow.
What we all want is the truth - good, bad or ugly.
