Know this and know it for a certainty: Carbon dioxide is plant food. Without it, plants wither and die. It is our OBLIGATION to increase carbon dioxide to the degree we are able, to aid our plant life on this planet to grow and extend to its maximum limit.
There is no climate “cure”, because there is no climate “disease”. We rely on carbon-based fuel, and the excess carbon dioxide merely goes into accelerated and extended plant growth. So long as we encourage plant growth at every juncture, by cultivation and land management, the content of carbon dioxide shall never rise above about 0.05% concentration in the atmosphere.
Plants require carbon dioxide to conduct photosynthesis, and greenhouses may enrich their atmospheres with additional CO2 to boost plant growth, since its low present-day atmosphere concentration is just above the “suffocation” level for green plants. A photosynthesis-related drop in carbon dioxide concentration in a greenhouse compartment can kill green plants.
The uncontrolled smokestack emissions of burning coal without any scrubber techniques in place, IS a crime against humanity. But now, carbon dioxide is being put in the same category as sulfur dioxide, mercury vapor, fly ash, cyanides, carbon monoxide, and particulate carbon. The consumption of coal as a fuel driving industry is close to being outlawed in this country by these fanatics.
A must read for all interested in the real reason for climate change, backed with scientific experiment as proof.
http://www.icr.org/article/4156/
*
*
http://icecap.us/index.php
Scroll down about 1/2 way to the article in center column entitled, "If You Don't Like History, Change It" Appears there has been a little tinkering with the data.
For several days recently, it looked as though perhaps Solar Cycle 24 was finally ready to start kicking up into high gear, but now the visible disk is once again completely spotless. Not a good sign.
How come the enviro-mentals never seem to mention that, even though CO2 levels and temperature are linked, the temperature always rises BEFORE the CO2 level? Correct me if I’m wrong, but I always thought the effect was supposed to come AFTER the cause. I forget exactly who, but one of the scientists skeptical of the global warming hysteria said that saying CO2 causes global warming is like saying lung cancer causes smoking.
Soviet historians could fearlessly foretell the ineluctable future, but could never predict the ever changing past.
![]() |
||
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · | ||