[mnehring]

Just making a note. Here is the SCOTUS docket for Berg’s case, 08a391

http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a391.htm

& 08570
http://origin.www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08-570.htm

Both denied by Souter.

[mnehring]

The certiorari orders from the 6th and 7th don’t have anything on this.
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/08ordersofthecourt.html

[Aliska]

Looks like it’s all denied. I thought it sounded fishy.

[little jeremiah]

Sorry, mnehrling - I can’t read legal documents and have the slightest grasp of their import. Could you explain in simple language - maybe “SCOTUS-speak for Dummies”?

And what is denied by Souter that is in them? Or is it something else?

(Sorry I am asking - this matter interests me greatly but I am dumm.)