[gogogodzilla]

The constitution details how and when to hold elections, it does not say why one must vote for one candidate or the other.

However, if you believe that voting is a matter of selecting a candidate that represents only a select few of your beliefs... when other candidates represent your views more closely.

Then you really should learn more about our form of government and what our founding fathers stood for.

---

"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." — John Quincy Adams

"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue, but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine, "The Rights of Man", 1792

(You would have us moderate our principals for the sake of a Republican victory?)

[SeekAndFind]

"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." — John Quincy Adams

With all due respect Mr. President, my first principle is to vote for the most conservative constitutionalist available. My second principle is given that there is less than ideal candidate, I would vote AGAINST the person who would lead us further AWAY from the constitution faster than the one who could at least act as the slower deterent.

Life does not always give us ideal choices.

"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue, but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine, "The Rights of Man", 1792

But which is worse Mr. Paine ? a President who has voted for and promises to give us more of constitutionalists like Justice Roberts and Justice Alito, or a president who has voted AGAINST these constitutionalists and promises to give us more of people like Ruth Ginsburg on the bench ?