Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/08/2008 3:43:30 PM PDT by GOPinCa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: GOPinCa

This is the full text:

October 08, 2008
Archives prove Obama was a New Party member
Thomas Lifson
Another piece in the puzzle of Barack Obama has been revealed, greatly strengthening the picture of a man groomed by an older generation of radical leftists for insertion into the American political process, trading on good looks, brains, educational pedigree, and the desire of the vast majority of the voting public to right the historical racial wrongs of the land.

The New Party was a radical left organization, established in 1992, to amalgamate far left groups and push the United States into socialism by forcing the Democratic Party to the left. It was an attempt to regroup the forces on the left in a new strategy to take power, burrowing from within. The party only lasted until 1998, when its strategy of “fusion” failed to withstand a Supreme Court ruling, but after, but the membership, including Barack Obama, continued to move the Democrats leftward with spectacular success.

Erick Erickson, editor of RedState, explained fusion in a Human Events article:

Fusion is a pretty simple concept. A candidate could run as both a Democrat and a New Party member to signal the candidate was, in fact, a left-leaning candidate, or at least not a center-left DLC type candidate. If the candidate — let’s call him Barack Obama — received only 500 votes in the Democratic Party against another candidate who received 1000 votes, Obama would clearly not be the nominee. But, if Obama also received 600 votes from the New Party, Obama’s New Party votes and Democratic votes would be fused. He would be the Democratic nominee with 1100 votes.

The fusion idea set off a number of third parties, but the New Party was probably the most successful. A March 22, 1998 In These Times article by John Nichols showed just how successful. “After six years, the party has built what is arguably the most sophisticated left-leaning political operation the country has seen since the decline of the Farmer-Labor, Progressive and Non-Partisan League groupings of the early part of the century .... In 1996, it helped Chicago’s Danny Davis, a New Party member, win a Democratic congressional primary, thereby assuring his election in the majority-black district .... The threat of losing New Party support, or of the New Party running its own candidates against conservative Democrats, would begin a process of forcing the political process to the left, [Joel] Rogers argued.”

Fusion, fortunately for the country, died in 1997. William Rehnquist, writing for a 6-3 Supreme Court, found the concept was not a protected constitutional right. It was two years too late to stop Obama.

J. Brown of Politically Drunk on Power has dug up multiple documentary sources (with hyperlinks) proving that Barack Obama was a member of the New Party, despite alleged attempts to cover up his tracks by scrubbing evidence. He or she deserves tremendous praise for doing this detective work.

Obama’s career bears many signs of being helped along by the radical left. At the critical moment when he entered electoral politics, he was part of a movement to take over an established political party and dirct it to the task of building a socialist America.

Hat tip: Rocco DiPippo


2 posted on 10/08/2008 3:44:02 PM PDT by GOPinCa (McCain/Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPinCa
The snowball is gaining mass and speed. This is fun. Sarah needs to mention it drag the mainstream socialist propaganda media kicking and screaming into the story.
4 posted on 10/08/2008 3:48:37 PM PDT by Proud2BeRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPinCa
These stories are a real eye opener for me. I always looked at Chicago as corrupt and everyone having their hand in the till. I didn't know it was such a socialist strong hold.

From my readings this week, it would seem obvious that OB and Ayers are probably conspiring to change the entire direction of education in this country. And the NEA will probably support the changes.

Ayers may be a smart terrorist. He's played everyone in Chicago like a violinn.

5 posted on 10/08/2008 3:49:44 PM PDT by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPinCa

Nobody has ever said that communists were dumb.


8 posted on 10/08/2008 3:56:07 PM PDT by i_dont_chat (The elephant is dancing for the lady from Alaska)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPinCa

“...the vast majority of the voting public to right the historical racial rights of the land.” Uh, “vast majority”? Did a poll tell him that??


9 posted on 10/08/2008 3:58:52 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPinCa
Since the title says the article proves Obama was a member of this party, doesn't it naturally follow that proof would be offered in that very article?

I see Obama's name dropped many times, but no documentation of his membership.
13 posted on 10/08/2008 4:14:04 PM PDT by HawaiianGecko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPinCa


20 posted on 10/08/2008 4:29:40 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - McCain/Palin'08 = http://www.johnmccain.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: GOPinCa

Bump


24 posted on 10/08/2008 5:16:30 PM PDT by stockpirate (US Congress just created the right to own slaves, problem is, we are the slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson