Obama had the power to make this all go away by producing the document in court, but has chosen to fight this suit, tooth and nail, instead. The only reason to continue fighting is that there is something in the long form that he doesn't want the public to know about.
Get lost troll.
Sorry, but that's just patently and factually incorrect.
The pixelation surrounding the typeface is entirely consistent with scanner and JPEG artifacts.
Here is a zoomed in image of "BIRTH" from the FactCheck Obama COLB scan:
And here is a zoomed in image "BIRTH" from the Michele COLB, which is not a forgery but is a scanned image of a genuine Hawaiian certificate:
As you can see, there is absolutely no fundamental difference between the two.
However unlike Polarik, I don't expect you to unquestioningly swallow whatever I say. I challenge you to verify this for yourself. It can be done very simply and easily and doesn't require anything more exotic than Microsoft Paint which comes with Windows.
Here is the scanned image of the Michele COLB that I used. It's a scan that was provided by Michele herself and is on Polarik's own PhotoBucket album:
Just pull up the image in your browser, right click and select "Copy Image" (or the equivalent if you're using something other than Firefox).
Pull up Microsoft Paint, click on "Edit" and then "Paste."
Set the zoom to 8x and look at the pixelation surrounding the typeface.
Then do the same with the FactCheck image here:
Report back and let us know if you find any fundamental differences between the two.
Others of course are welcome to do the same.