Posted on 10/07/2008 2:02:58 PM PDT by moopie1
Excellent point, and one I also raised in reference to the real COLB that Michele sent me, "If a total stranger can do it, then why not Obama?"
FactCheck is Annenberg. Annenberg is linked to Obama and Ayers.
I'm not sure who's COLB Factcheck got its "hands" on, but my money is on FactCheck and Annenberg being the souce of all the forgeries, both scanned and photographed..
It should be no surprise that the offices of Annenberg were used for their phony photo shoot, so why not the scan as well.
Yep. FactCheck has both the means, the opportunity, and the motive for manufacturing Obama's COLB from someone else's scanned original.
I've said that FactCheck most likely made the other two copies of it and sent them to the Kos and FTS, respectively. In fact, I'd bet that they sent the Kos a copy that was already cropped, with Certificate Number redacted, and with a moderate increase in JPG compression, just so that they could release the "original scan" (just a less compressed version) when the time came for it.
Sure enough, that's exactly what they did. That's the reason why the same Exif data is in both copies.
Then they basically waited to see what sorts of responses they would receive on the Kos and FTS websites. However, they did't wait for long because they issued their "higher res" forgery copy on June 16.
What I'd like to know, for sure, is why they decided to do the photo shoot in mid-August after everyone else's research had been discredited.
I mean, I can make a compelling case for myself being the thorn in their side that prompted it because I kept pressing the issue, keeping it alive when they thought that they were in the clear, and that it had rolled over and died.
But, in reality, FactCheck, like so many of their dishonest breed, do really stupid things thinking that nobody is going to question them.
It's what they say that gave them away.
Which reemphasizes the question, who did pay for his time at Harvard. Keeping a car in Cambridge is expensive and a major hassle. You wouldn't do it if you were living off of scholarships, loans and income from part time jobs.
I'm afraid you'll be waiting around an awwwwwwwful long time for that.
I have no party affiliation, and don't work for Obama or the DNC. If I were to put any sort of label on my politics, it would be libertarian. And neither Obama nor McCain will be getting my vote in November.
No, there aren't. But I've spent enough time with Polarik's nonsense so I'll just leave it at that.
Here's the 64,000 dollar question that the Obama apologists on this thread simply cannot answer :
Why in the hell is it OK for FactCheck to get its hands on a copy of Obama's CoLB but NOT OK for an actual Court of Law to obtain a certified copy of the long form...???
Here's a better question. Why didn't Berg simply pay a visit Obama's campaign headquarters in Chicago and ask to see the actual paper document? Even the folks at FactCheck had to put in at least that much effort.
My own pet theory is that the leftists want to either create a constitutional crisis or a civil war by getting someone elected who's not qualified. If he's elected then they're going to dare anyone to challenge it. If he truly isn't constitutionally eligible to be President it's not going to be pretty.
That's incorrect. Berg made that claim in his original filing.
These are criminal fraud charges against Obama and the DNC.
Berg cannot levy any criminal fraud charges against Obama or the DNC. This is a civil suit. Any criminal charges would have to come from the US Justice Department.
And it should REALLY be no surprise that as usual you're absolutely incorrect.
The photos were taken at Obama's campaign headquarters in Chicago. Not at Annenberg.
Here's a Chicago Sun Times article about Obama's new (at the time) headquarters:
Obama's new HQ has room to move
If you click on the image with "PHOTO GALLERY" above it, you'll find among the photos, this one, in which you can see the carpet pattern:
And here is photograph 3 from FactCheck's website. The gamma has been adjusted to bring out details from the very dark background of the original image.
As you can see, the carpeting is the same as that in Obama's campaign headquarters in Chicago.
Polarik's been trying to feed people similar nonsense for months, and sadly most people don't have the wherewithal to know any better.
I said previously that I'd wasted enough time on his nonsense, but since he decided to post in this thread and try feeding you even more nonsense, I thought I'd just give a quick example of how easy it is to shoot down this sh... stuff.
What you can do is just go to www.diyaudio.com, click on "Search," enter "Steve Eddy" in "Search by User Name," and set Search Options for "Show results as posts."
It's 916 457-7946.
Sorry.
I'll make this simple. When doubts surrounding a Presidential candidate's qualifications regarding his birthright citizenship and birth records reach a point where he actually has to put own his own sites on the web to specifically deal with these questions, and he has to actually fight efforts to produce his birth certificate in court, well, then it is well past time to allow outside parties to obtain their own copies of that candidate's birth certificate. In other states, media entities would have been able to obtain their own certified copies of a candidate's birth certificate directly from the Registrar's office.
So what Obama should have done was allow various media entities to obtain their own certified copies of his CoLB directly through Hawaii's Department of Health. NBC News, Fox News, the WSJ, IBD, the Washington Times , the Washington Post, the New York Post and the New York Times should been able to obtain their own certified copies from the DoH, and then they all could have posted their own scans on their official websites. Such an approach wouldn't have cost the Obama campaign a dime, seeing how each of these organizations could have paid the processing fees for the certificates themselves.
By this stage of the game, there is simply no point in failing to produce the document that Berg is requesting. Obama could do this in a hearbeat, he simply refuses to do so. Such an approach only serves to fuel the doubts and suspicions of the very people you are attempting to win over. It is a waste of Obama's time and money. The same holds true for the taxpayers. It is simply the most counter-productive approach he can take. He should have produced the documents for the court and nipped this thing in the bud.
He produced a document for FactCheck, he can certainly produced a copy of the long form for the Court. The was never any reason not to do so.
Yeah, his claim that the FactCheck photos were taken at Annenberg's offices, rather than Obama's Chicago campaign headquarters was real solid.
He's just another Techdude.
But hey, believe whatever you want to believe.
do they even have birth certificates in Kenya??
The hospital he claims to have been born in wasn’t built yet...................
“Is this the same RNC opposition research team that Larry Johnson of NoQuarter reported had gone to Hawaii and acquired Obama’s original Hawaiian birth certificate and that it was in the name of Barry Soetoro?”
Never heard of that team...sounds like a dangerous mission though. /s
“So which birth certificate are they going to drop on him? The one from Hawaii or the one from Kenya?”
My money is on Kenya... “former US President Bill Clinton identified Kibaki as the one living person he would most like to meet ‘because of the Kenyan government’s decision to abolish school fees for primary education.’”
Billy Jeff can have his inside contacts in Kenya make one up from scratch if needed. Obama better be careful... if he leaves holes in his personal story, the Clintonistas will be more than happy to fill them in for him using their own artistic license :-)
Yeah. Might end up being garroted with a lei.
That strawman argument won't work.
The attributes and characteristics within the document and its typeface are all consistent with those of a certification of live birth issued by the Hawaiian Department of Health.
That strawman argument won't work.
As I said, I just gave it as a quick and simple example of how Polarik likes to "invent" stuff. And also as I said, over the previous several months I'd already addressed the fabrications offered up by Techdude and Polarik and don't care to waste any more time on irrelevant issues.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.