“Are you implying that we should be less concerned about Lundgrens land being taken by the government because hes rich?”
No I’m not implying that (I knew you would say this). Of course the principle of private ownership is fundamental and universal.
But there is not enough information about this case in the article. Knowing the facts is essential. Especially when a bright new conservative comes on the scene with the potential to start her own version of a Reagan revolution—I expect dirt digging, mud slinging and garbage throwing.
That’s what this is until you give me enough facts.
“Thats what this is until you give me enough facts.”
Of course. If you don’t think there’s enough here to make any conclusions, then perhaps you’re right.
The point I was trying to make is that Sarah Palin is not a flawless gem. The attacks are coming, and some of them have some meat to them. We can’t ignore them and we can’t shout them down (we can HERE, but not in the public arena where we compete with the MSM).
Thanks for providing some serious discussion on this.