Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Divided Loyalties, Obama’s Eligibility Problem, PART 2
Texas Darlin ^ | July 26, 2008 | Judah Benjamin

Posted on 07/26/2008 4:23:30 AM PDT by Amityschild

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: usmcobra

It is a great read though, huh?


41 posted on 07/26/2008 7:07:38 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Amityschild

I didn’t get to the John Dean one yet. I will; but I’m still back tracking on Judah’s article. Pulling references I remember reading from other sources. I may be on this one a while!


42 posted on 07/26/2008 7:09:17 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Reily
>>>Obama must be defeated on the issues.

The Constitution is a the trumping issue for me. The rest don't matter. No sense arguing things that are irrelevant if he isn't qualified.

43 posted on 07/26/2008 7:11:40 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Reily

Obama can never be defeated on the issues for one simple reason.....

He cannot be pinned down on any of them.

Frankly it surprises me how so many political geniuses fail to recognize that simple fact, you cannot beat a man with the issues that changes his views on the issues as much Barack Obama does.

You must find his fatal flaw and use it to break his political image, that flaw is he is not eligible to be president and is hiding the proof that conceals that fact and is willing to by proxy defraud the entire country to that end with a phony photoshopped document that even fact check .org thinks is real.


44 posted on 07/26/2008 7:16:37 AM PDT by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: freema; frithguild

Go read this whole thing!


45 posted on 07/26/2008 7:18:06 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
The Constitution is always the trumping issue to me also.
So between you & me those are 2 votes.
Looks kind of lonely doesn't it !

The remaining 20% that actually decide elections! (I assume the remaining electorate vote 40% always GOP & 40% always democrat.) That 20% are dimly aware that there are such things as elections don't care about Constitutional issues. To them the Constitution is that thing where they had to memorize the awful preamble to back in Jr High civics class.

46 posted on 07/26/2008 7:22:21 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Thank you for posting it again.

I will read the entire article.


47 posted on 07/26/2008 7:22:21 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

I did my homework on this years ago, the Panama canal zone was never US soil or a territory, the treaty we signed with the Panamanian government we created gave us only the right to administer the canal and the zone around it. It has never been a US territory.

And McCain is a Natural born citizen because of the oldest of United States Navy traditions, he is a son born to a United States Navy member and his wife while serving overseas such has been the case since the age of wooden ships and iron men and their women that went with them aboard those ships.


48 posted on 07/26/2008 7:23:24 AM PDT by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Reily

There is no law saying you ‘can’t run’ for President. But there is a law saying he can’t server. He can’t be sworn in. Our votes are irrelevant even if we wanted to vote for him.

So why waste time arguing the resume when he need not apply?


49 posted on 07/26/2008 7:25:37 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra; Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

I’m thinking Gatun misread your post 34.

You both think the same thing on the geography. I think you just misunderstood each other.


50 posted on 07/26/2008 7:27:34 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

There is also the powers of the US Ambassador for births that happen off base soil.


51 posted on 07/26/2008 7:28:50 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

Gee...could the Republican National Convention actually be interesting? Even exciting? Perhaps we need a Republican version of PUMA!


52 posted on 07/26/2008 7:29:23 AM PDT by Amityschild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra
Kerry was a “Change-O-Matic” and he lost!
That in itself is an issue and is a reflection on Obama’s lack of political maturity.
My point in my previous posts was that knocking him out with some sort of legalistic constitutional argument, rock-solid though it may be won't fly! Too man voters don't give a rat's pa-toot about the integrity of the Constitution.
To them its not the “law of the land” but a point of minor historic interest. That is “minor interest” when they can't find “American Idol” or some other piece of TV flotsam to watch.
53 posted on 07/26/2008 7:32:03 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia


THE AUDACITY OF TRUTH ABOUT OBAMA'S UPBRINGING

54 posted on 07/26/2008 7:38:54 AM PDT by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Reily

I wish I could go back & re-edit my posts !!!

“..Too man voters ...” should be “..Too many voters ...”


55 posted on 07/26/2008 7:40:41 AM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: usmcobra

Okay.

I admit your expertise about my part of the world is without peer. It is numbing.

You must come here and teach us. We have so much to learn.

(We promise not to laugh.)


56 posted on 07/26/2008 7:43:52 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Reily
Kerry wasn't just knocked out on 'change'. Kerry couldn't serve either.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1300479/posts
Kerry is/was an illegal candidate per US Constitution 14th Amendment Section 3


57 posted on 07/26/2008 7:44:24 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

bump


58 posted on 07/26/2008 7:47:02 AM PDT by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Reily

The difference is that Obama is “black” where as Kerry mister flip flop himself, was essentially everything democrats hate about white people.

It’s an armor you cannot defeat by discussing the issues, because he can say anything he wants and gets away with it.

Exposing the fact that he shouldn’t even be considered by law is the one thing that being “black” won’t defend him against, even the most bitter partisan politico will have to admit that if he is an illegitimate candidate, in more ways then one, he shouldn’t run for the office.

Proving that his doctored birth certificate is a fraud is the first step in proving he riding a bunch of Jack Asses in this race.


59 posted on 07/26/2008 7:52:43 AM PDT by usmcobra (I sing Karaoke the way it was meant to be sung, drunk, badly and in Japanese)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

“The Canal Zone is and always has been Panamanian territory...”

That is just it. It was never Panamanian territory.

It became part of Panama when Carter gave the Canal Zone away.

The Canal Zone belonged to the United States from the begining.

Anybody who owned land in the Canal Zone got bought out by us.

The Canal Zone became the Canal Zone the day Panama separated (with our help) from Colombia on 3 November 1903.


60 posted on 07/26/2008 7:53:27 AM PDT by Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson