Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: GregNH; LucyT; Utilizer

And being under 18, could Stanley Ann have even married?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3274207/posts?page=14#14

To: Gluteus Maximus

I believe that technically, if you are younger than eighteen years of age you are not legally an adult. If his mother was not an adult, then she could not legally transfer anything to him as she would be technically a minor, not allowed to perform any legal acts on her own. That includes being bound by any contracts or legal agreements, and having no power to sign any legal documents on her own recognizance.

14 posted on Tue Mar 31 12:09:05 2015 by Utilizer (Bacon A’kbar! - In world today are only peaceful people, and the muzlims trying to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies | Report Abuse]


9,619 posted on 11/01/2017 6:39:14 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9616 | View Replies ]


To: GregNH; LucyT; Utilizer

Correction:

Under 18 s/b under 21.

IIRC, back then in 1961, one had to be 21 to enter into contracts, etc.


9,620 posted on 11/01/2017 6:43:59 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9619 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson