Please check out this important * Post:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2040486/posts?page=9018#9018
[Thanks, Fred Nerks.]
FOR THOSE WHO STILL BELIEVE ZERO’S ELIGABILITY TO BE POTUS IS JUST A ‘BIRTHER SCAM’, BE AWARE THAT THE NET IS CLOSING:
Posted 05/01/10 Read all 34 comments +14 raves
“...as early as 2005, some individuals presently serving in his administration appear to have known that the eligibility issue relative to his citizenship might become a future problem.
“A twenty-six page article written by Sarah P. HERLIHY was published in the Chicago-Kent Law Review, Volume 81:275 titled “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle.” The date of publication is 22 February 2006, although the article appears to have been written by HERLIHY in late 2005. As the title implies, the author argues that Article II of the U.S. Constitution inhibits “globalization” of the U.S. She further opines that the provision is discriminatory, outdated, and undemocratic. On page fifteen of her article, HERLIHY references several hypothetical arguments that bear an eerie likeness to the not-so hypothetical implementation of policies we are witnessing under the OBAMA administration.”
It should also become obvious from reading this why the issue is so important.
http://www.examiner.com/x-37620-Conservative-Examiner~y2010m4...
Earlier this week a special report was issued by the Northeast Intelligence Network on the many problems involved with providing proof that Barack Obama meets the eligibility requirements of the U.S. Constitution for Presidential candidates.
Today, the chief investigative officer for the Northeast Intelligence Network, Douglas J. Hagmann, has issued Part II of his series on this issue, and has determined that there is ‘no proof’ that Obama meets the eligibility requirements as set forth by the Constitution.
Hagmann is not without his critics. In fact, in the days since the publication of his initial report, the Obama apologists have come out of the woodwork to attack, smear, and denigrate the character of the investigator, who, by the way, has been hired by many Fortune 100 companies to do top-level investigations.
In responding to those critics, Hagmann says the following:
In the first part of this investigative report, background was provided to identify the core legal and constitutional arguments in the matter of Barack Hussein OBAMA II’s eligibility to hold the office of President of the United States. Using my investigative experience, I performed this investigation in compliance with the same “industry standards” that apply to performing background investigations of individuals selected for corporate positions by Fortune 100 companies.
Hagmann uses the very same standards that Fortune 100 companies pay him large sums of money to use in his investigations for them in order to arrive at his conclusions concerning Obama eligibility. If these standards were insufficient, one can safely conclude these large corporations would not be willing to unitize his services.
But the issue at hand is the conclusion reached by the investigator regarding Obama eligibility:
It is the conclusion of this investigator that Barack Hussein OBAMA II has not only failed to provide proof of eligibility, but has and continues to fight efforts to release the proof necessary to confirm that he is legally eligible to occupy his current position as the president of the United States.
As Hagmann points out in this second report, the Constitutional standard is ‘proof’ and not ‘evidence.’ Candidates for the office of President must PROVE their eligibility by submitting the required documents. This was never done by Barack Obama. The ‘certification of live birth’ which Hawaii claims is on record and which certain websites have reproduced does not meet the standard of ‘proof.’
In addition, Hagmann notes that many of those who support Barack Obama know full well that he has never met the Constitutional standard for Presidential eligibility.
How do we know this?
Obama supporters who are well aware of the standard of ‘proof’ of citizenship attempted to get the standard changed so that candidates such as Obama would have no problem meeting the eligibility requirements. If, as they claim, Obama is indeed eligible, then why would they make such a big deal about the need for changing the Constitution back in 2005 with regard to the standard for Presidential eligibility?
Hagmann makes this stunning revelation:
...as early as 2005, some individuals presently serving in his administration appear to have known that the eligibility issue relative to his citizenship might become a future problem.
A twenty-six page article written by Sarah P. HERLIHY was published in the Chicago-Kent Law Review, Volume 81:275 titled “Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle.” The date of publication is 22 February 2006, although the article appears to have been written by HERLIHY in late 2005. As the title implies, the author argues that Article II of the U.S. Constitution inhibits “globalization” of the U.S. She further opines that the provision is discriminatory, outdated, and undemocratic. On page fifteen of her article, HERLIHY references several hypothetical arguments that bear an eerie likeness to the not-so hypothetical implementation of policies we are witnessing under the OBAMA administration.
Thus, it is clear that many close to Obama, and who now serve in the Administration, knew full well that their candidate would have a problem with regard to the eligibility issue.
Hagmann further notes the difficulty of getting documentation from Nancy Pelosi, the one who ‘certified’ Obama as eligible. He reports that there are discrepancies and suspicions galore regarding the manner in which Pelosi went about pushing through Obama’s candidacy, and to date, she has failed to provide any evidence whatsoever that shows a vetting process into Obama’s background and required documentation.
The implications of this information are, indeed, scandalous. Hagmann has more, and that information will be reported as it becomes available.
You!Join the discussion! Leave a comment. Add Photos & Videos
Please check out this important * Post:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2040486/posts?page=9018#9018
[Thanks, Fred Nerks.]
Excellent .. and what we’ve all known
for a very long time.
The spottiness and scams of his past
are only exceeded by his incompetence
and total unfit-ness for the office.
It’s not going away ...
"A twenty-six page article written by Sarah P. Herlihy...titled "Amending the Natural Born Citizenship Requirement:...
The way this is stated seems to imply that the author of the cited law review article, Ms. Herlihy, is currently in the administration. If so, what position does she hold and what has she been up to in that position?