One of the reasons you doubt she was rehearsed is because she thinks Stanley Ann was on her way through Seattle to visit Obama Sr. in Boston when she was there. Historical fact is that Obama Sr. was not in Boston until a year later.
If you were preping her to testify, you would have fixed that by reminding her why Stanley Ann had her two or three day old kid on Mercer Island in August 1961.
And you accept the August 1961 date because Jr. was in diapers and mother had not yet learned to change them.
I think you meant to write 'one of the reasons you BELIEVE she was rehearsed'
And yes, that is the prime reason. There is no way Stanley Ann would have told her she was on the way to Boston or anywhere on the mainland, 'to join her husband' because obama snr didn't leave Hawaii until JUNE 22, 1962.
If you were preping her to testify, you would have fixed that by reminding her why Stanley Ann had her two or three day old kid on Mercer Island in August 1961.
Tell me why.
And you accept the August 1961 date because Jr. was in diapers and mother had not yet learned to change them.
No I don't. She said what she said, Boston and all. I don't believe anything she had to say. Her 'testimony' isn't credible IMO.
Question 1: Why do you think the original Susan Blake video was withdrawn?
Question 2: Why do you think the truncated version replaced it?
Please do not assume I accept anything or everything from that Atlas Shrugs article, just because I linked to it. That article, filled with interesting detail, is NOT the final answer to the question I pose:
WHERE WAS STANLEY ANN BETWEEN SUMMER OF 1960 UNTIL SHE SHOWED UP WITH AN (APPROX) TWO YEAR OLD IN HAWAII?