[Fred Nerks]

As a reminder: FOR THE RECORD:

A Defined And Serious Injury

People forget that Obama’s lawyers have already admitted that whatever is in Obama’s bona fides would, “cause a defined and serious injury” to Obama and/or the DNC.

During the Federal Circuit Court ruling on Phil Berg’s claim, judge, R. Barclay Surrick, ruled that any objection or refutation had to be served within thirty days. The Obama team contented itself with a motion to dismiss the case and a protective order.

In these motions, Obama’s lawyers argued that revealing the information (birth certificate, citizenship in other countries, etc.) would “cause a defined and serious injury” to Obama and/or the DNC. They argued that revealing these documents raises a “legitimate privacy concern” and the above mentioned risk that “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation.” The source of that embarrassment was not specified.

That’s why Obama fights the release of his bona fides — “particularly serious embarrassment will result from turning over the requested documentation.” — his own attorneys said so.

http://www.theobamafile.com/ObamaLatest.htm

[LucyT]

Thanks, Fred Nerks.

Begin here and read to bottom of page for updates. Commentary by David at #7284.