I'll take Texas Darlin at her word -- she shut down her blog when it was time to pack to go to Denver. In recent days her blog had become highly active, and since she was the one and only moderator, it would have worn her out.Could be. I can see it either way. But taken together with the other points it does seem suspicious.
The only "conspiracy" I see in this is the one between The Hawaiian Department of State and Obama. Why?What are they conspiring to do? Hide inconvenient facts or neuter the opposition?
These loose statements might be chalked up to incompetence, but when she made up the excuse for the blacked out certificate number, that suggests a possible conspiracy to defraud the public.Could be some of both.
There's no doubt that statement is nonsense. Under my theory it doesn't matter if she convinced anyone who is following this issue or not. In fact it would be better if she didn't. The court with a definitive answer is what they are looking for.
Court proceedings with the power to enforce penalties for perjury, impeaching witnesses and misprision of felony, along with the power to subpoena can be helpful. Still, they are not perfect. A general public vigilance often uncovers what can be hid from the highly regulated evidence gathering process of a court.
So yes, ideally such broad public vigilance will have aspects of a snipe hunt.
(Just to note: What we do want to avoid is witch hunts.)